National Journal of Physiology

Register      Login

VOLUME 4 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2016 ) > List of Articles

SHORT COMMUNICATION

Students approaches to learning and perceptions of assessment in a non-summative context

Arifath Mohideen, Manopriya Sheriff, Nellige GS

Keywords : educational assessment, learning, perceptions

Citation Information : Mohideen A, Sheriff M, GS N. Students approaches to learning and perceptions of assessment in a non-summative context. 2016; 4 (2):36-41.

DOI: 10.5005/NJP-11056-04_02_07

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; NA


Abstract

Background: As a deep approach to learning is related to high-quality learning outcomes, assessments need to encourage students to adopt the same. Aim: This preliminary study was undertaken to determine the first-year dental students' perceptions about a Medal examination in Physiology that invoked use of a deep approach to learning and to infer their approaches to learning. Materials and Methods: Based on their performance in a first-phase multiple-choice question-based test, 10 students were selected from a batch of 84 students. 7 of the 10 selected students attended the final phase of the examination in which, case-based, structured essay type questions were employed. Open-ended, written feedback on their experience of the final phase was submitted by 5 students. Results: The perceptions of 5 of the 7 students who attended the final phase were appreciative of an assessment which invoked a deep approach to learning. Conclusion: The students' appreciation of an assessment that invokes a deep approach to learning in a non-summative context is significant in the context of learning behaviours.


PDF Share
PDF Share
  1. Boud D, Falchikov N. Aligning Assessment with Long-term Learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2006;31(4):399-413.
  2. Yurdugül H, Menzi Çetin N. Investigation of the Relationship between Learning Process and Learning Outcomes in E-learning Environments. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 2015;59(4):57-74.
  3. Marton F, Saijo R. On Qualitative Differences on Learning: I - Outcome and Process. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1976;46:4-11.
  4. Entwistle NJ, Ramsden P. Understanding Student Learning. London: Croon-Helm; 1983.
  5. Trigwell K, Prosser M. Improving the Quality of Student Learning: the influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education 1991;22(3):251-266.
  6. Biggs JB. What the Student Does: Teaching for Enhanced Learning. Higher Education Research and Development 1999;18(1):57-75.
  7. Baeten M, Kyndt E, Struyven K, Dochy F. Using Student-centred Learning environments to Stimulate Deep Approaches to Learning: Factors Encouraging or Discouraging their Effectiveness. Educational Research Review 2010;5(3):243-260.
  8. Entwistle N, Tait H. Approaches to Learning, Evaluations of Teaching, and Preferences for Contrasting Academic Environments. High Educ, 1990;19(2):169-194.
  9. Lizzio A, Wilson K, Simons R. University Students' Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Academic Outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education 2002;27(l):27-52.
  10. Krathwohl DR. A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice 2002;41(4):212-218.
  11. Mehta G, Mokhasi V. Item Analysis of multiple Choice Questions - An assessment of the Assessment Tool. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research 2014;4(7)197-202.
  12. Mayya S, Roff S. Students' perceptions of educational environment: a comparison of academic achievers and under-achievers at Kasturba medical college, India. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2004 Nov;17(3):280-91.
  13. Yonker, Julie E. The Relationship of Deep and Surface Study Approaches on Factual and Applied Test-Bank Multiple-Choice Question Performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2011;36(6):673-686.
  14. Fry H, Ketteridge S, Marshall S, eds. A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing Academic Practice. New York and London: Routledge; 2009.
  15. Birenbaum M. Assessment Preferences and Their Relationship to Learning Strategies and Orientations. Higher Education 1997;33(l):71-84.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.